Megan Fox holding a Motorola Devour, in the bath
Here’s horrible but also quite nice in certain ways Hollywood star Megan Fox. She’s using a mobile phone in the bath. This film was broadcast during the Superbowl last night, as a public safety announcement about what not to do with your expensive new mobile phone.
Hopefully there’s a racier European edit of the advert, in which she films herself soaping up using the Devour’s 3megapixel camera sensor.
filed in ACTUAL PRODUCTS on Feb.08, 2010



February 8th, 2010 on 11:09 am
Being a highly paid film star isn’t enough? She must do adverts too? What a whore. They’re all whores. Saw a giant billboard of George Clooney selling coffee the other week. What a whore.
And that close-up isn’t her real hand because she has bigtoe thumbs.
February 8th, 2010 on 4:44 pm
Megan Who?
Oh, Fox. I could just scroll back up and read it back. Gee.
February 8th, 2010 on 5:05 pm
If Disney ever made a film about a young raccoon called Todd on a quest to free his father from the local zoo, her squeaky, pre-pubescent schoolboy voice would be perfect for it.
February 8th, 2010 on 7:40 pm
I often take a bath in my garden too while taking pictures of myself because I’m such an unethical self-obsessed, crass publicity whore cunt.
You know that dystopian future where everything is run by business and we are cynically manipulated with sexual imagery, constantly telling us to buy things we don’t need? Well, it began 70 years ago. Fucking whores. Look at her, nude in a bath telling us to buy something. She’ll do owt for owt.
BUY THIS NEW THING THAT IS LIKE THE THING YOU ALREADY HAVE BECAUSE SOME ARTLESS AVARICIOUS BEAUTY CUNT SAYS SO.
No conscience, no consciousness.
Can’t even call her a sell-out. She has no integrity to sell out from. She wouldn’t even be aware of the issues involved. Slap some cash in her hand and she’ll agree.
I’ve finished.
February 8th, 2010 on 9:04 pm
Is it just that the production values are way up there, or did anyone else find the guy falling off the ladder to be a little too realistic? I think someone may have actually died there.
February 8th, 2010 on 10:04 pm
I may be masturbating furiously but I’m pulling a stern face and tutting while I do so.
February 8th, 2010 on 11:03 pm
Dick Socrates – I think for all your righteous indignation at having advertising companies and shameless whores doing their utmost to put one over on you, I think you may have overlooked something; I think they may have succeeded in their task and got you to believe at least part of the image they’re selling – “Look at her, nude in a bath telling us to buy something.”
Sorry to break it to you, but I seriously doubt she stripped down to her birthday suit to get into the bath whilst there was a film crew present (bath outdoors or otherwise, it’s hollywood, who knows what madness afflicts the plumbers round there?)
And just as well, I say. Well done to her for maintaining some form of standards and dignity in this day and age. Both my Wife and I remain fully clothed at all times, including during our daily ablutions and it’s good to know we’re not the only ones. I ensure daily that I always have a full suit on underneath anything I choose to wear. Too many people walk around these days, quite brazenly naked underneath their clothes. If only others took such care as I do then maybe this world wouldn’t be falling to rack and ruin.
Would.
In the bath.
Because she’s grubby.
And would probably allow you to change at Baker St.
February 9th, 2010 on 12:13 pm
No, I am infallible. She is nude. And I’m not buying or going to see anything she is vaguely connected with. I have third hand accounts that she is in the Transformers movies. I have seen neither and will die with that being the case.
February 9th, 2010 on 4:11 pm
Would. I’ve had a thing for Megan Fox ever since I saw her wearing a Star Wars T-shirt:
http://media.filmschoolrejects.com/images/megan-fox-starwars.jpg
We could talk about Star Wars for at least five minutes! Then she would say that she needs to be somewhere else because an awkward silence has kicked in. Best imaginary moment of my life EVER.
February 9th, 2010 on 4:35 pm
Looks like she’s quite a fan of gravy browning too going by her skin tone in that pic
February 9th, 2010 on 5:06 pm
I think she looks like that because she lives where there’s actually some sunshine once in a while. And unlike us, she probably goes outside instead of drawing the curtains to stop the light shining onto our TVs/monitors.
That, or she lives in Liverpool, where there are more tanning salons than actual people.
February 9th, 2010 on 5:23 pm
She’s holding a different telephone in the Star Wars / Bisto promo pic. Though it looks like it might be waterproof and is, therefore, still good for bathing situations.
Who is she, again?
February 9th, 2010 on 5:29 pm
Hang on. Sorry. I just actually played the video. Brilliant! It could be the same phone after all. I can’t be absolutely sure because living outside of the USA means that I’ve never actually seen a Motorola telephone.
February 9th, 2010 on 5:54 pm
Think she’d wash her hair before they started filming, look at how greasy it is. The silly mare.
February 10th, 2010 on 12:52 pm
You’re correct in not bothering with the Transformers movies, Mr. Socrates. I, alas, have seen both.
They’re quite nasty, and I just don’t get why they are like they are. They are clearly only of any interest to young boys of about 7 who are into the toys (like my son), but Micheal Bay clearly thinks that these same 7 uear old boys need subjecting to constant, grubby sexual innuendo. I watched them to see what parts I could show to my son…
First film review: Mainly OK for a 7 year old with some judicial skipping, but only because youngsters miss most of the dialogue. Contains one astonishingly misjudged, offensive, ‘why oh why the fuck did that need to make the final edit’ scene of depressingly mainstream racism and mysogeny when a black car salesman calls his mum a bitch and threatens to hit her with a rock or something. Unbelievably unnecessary.
Second film review: The focus groups must’ve said the best thing about the first was the grubby sexual innuendo. It’s times 10 here; everyone says ’shit’ as often as possible. Ms. Fox, apparently after having happened to oil herself, straddles a Harley in microscopic hotpants, undresses a bit, says ’shit’ a bit. A pretty young student turns out to be an evil robot and extends a mechanical tail our of the smallest part of the gusset of her underwear. Presumably it’s a stabby robot tenticle that extends from her minge. Nice, very ‘12A’. The hero’s mum shouts ‘humorous’ swear words constantly and has a hilarious canabis related mishap. I could only let the lad watch the action scenes from this one, these amount to about 2 hours of incomrehensible, blurry, deafening can’t-see-whatthefucks-happening nonsense where racially stereotyped metal dingbats budgeon each other. It’s heavy going.
Ir’s my own fault for caving in to pester power, I know. But damn – these are horribly concieved films.
February 10th, 2010 on 1:10 pm
Only one good thing about the 2nd one – there’s a senile old robot that witters on about stuff that makes no sense and is vaguely amusing. (As opposed to all the other characters that witter on without making any sense.)
For some reason, he transforms from a plane into a robot with a walking stick. Wonder what part of him the walking stick was when he was younger and didn’t need it. (I know, I shouldn’t try to find sense where there is none.)
1 good line in the whole film –
Jetfire: My ancestors have been here for centuries! My father, why, he was a wheel! The FIRST wheel! Do you know what he tranformed into? NOTHING! But he did it with honour! DIGNITY, damn it!
There, now you have absolutely no reason to watch it now (either, in fact), as that’s the best bit in either of the films.
February 10th, 2010 on 3:04 pm
Tap it? I would.
February 10th, 2010 on 3:39 pm
As someone who once had the misfortune to live in Liverpool correct marimo: the skanks in Liverpool are the brightest orange you’ve ever seen. It’s quite clear, in most cases, that they’ve never seen a person with a real tan and refer to the original umpalumpas for colour reference.
badben: thanks, I’ll just go and look up the “stradles a Harley” bit.
February 10th, 2010 on 4:28 pm
Yeah; from, you know, a technical view point I didn’t exactly *mind* glisteny Megan Fox in hot pants; I’m just baffled as to who considers it appropriate in a kids film.
Gigerpunk – Yes, Jetfire drew the only smiles the film got from me. Also when he fires some missles backwards in error and says “bollocks” in a very un-American way. I haven’t checked this (so someone will probably tell me if I’m right or not soon), but I think he’s voiced by Simon Pegg; this is because he sounds exactly like Buck in Ice Age 3, who is voiced by Simon Pegg. I’m not going to check, I don’t want to spoil the surprise.
This is how one has fun with the internet these days. By not looking things up. It’s good because you can do it even without an internet connection at home.
February 11th, 2010 on 12:10 pm
Badben, I am going to say you are right about Simon Pegg. Though, I too am not checking it out.
Rebels we are!