Gadget with FACES #199: The Dell Mono Laser Printer
We’re going to do lots and lots of Gadgets with FACES updates classified as #199, so it looks like we did this and this on purpose as a joke. And not because we can’t count.
What was the name of the fat old woman Les Dawson used to do?
filed in GADGETS WITH FACES on Jul.07, 2010
July 7th, 2010 on 11:22 am
Sissy and Ada was the name of the sketch. I can’t remember which one Les Dawson played. The other one was Roy Barraclough.
July 7th, 2010 on 1:02 pm
It’s a clear NO FACE. This is just reaching. Next?
July 7th, 2010 on 1:04 pm
Nope, no face
July 7th, 2010 on 1:06 pm
Also, with Regards to Les Dawson, that would be Margaret
July 7th, 2010 on 1:47 pm
-1
And what happened to the DELL badge on #1 ? Looks like a photoshop slip-up that someone couldn’t be arsed to undo
July 7th, 2010 on 3:38 pm
stuck at #199? Try a reboot. power it down fully, wait 5 min, then power back on. No, you have to turn it off. No, don’t just unplug it. Nevermind, let me do it.
WV: Facal – matter that is supposed to look like a face, but it easier associated with fecal matter. I miss doing these.
July 7th, 2010 on 3:45 pm
Look again, gentlemen. These are, in fact, magnificent robocops. Apparently it’s fitted with lasers, too.
July 7th, 2010 on 4:54 pm
But even the great Robocop himself only barely has a face. Can something that approximates to something that barely has a face have a face?
I propose that the entropy of transformation can only reduce the given ‘faceness’ of any object. The laws of the universe are against the random enhancement of face-like elements, if you accept that ‘faceness’ is a manifestation of order.
I don’t think we can ask for philosophical help on this one. The greatest authority on things that look like faces must surely be us lot, no?
July 7th, 2010 on 5:15 pm
The authoritative meta-analysis on this subject, a.k.a. Sexy Executives, clearly proves the hypothesis that randomly enhanced face-like elements hardly hinder the recognition of the whole as “a face“.
If your strict proposal would be true, many of our fellow species would lose “face”.
July 7th, 2010 on 7:11 pm
Would someone please at least make a would/wouldn’t level of comment please? I haven’t felt this thick since I tried to watch ‘Only Connect’.
July 7th, 2010 on 8:30 pm
hee hee, GigerPunk said “entropy”
I think you meant “a Trophy”.
There you go.
July 8th, 2010 on 8:04 am
11 comments and no one went with “Your mum” as an answer to Idiot’s question? Are we so respectful?
July 8th, 2010 on 9:04 am
Idiot’s Mum – respectfully would.